If nations are not at war, they always seem to be rumors of wars. If neither of those two situations are dominant then there is a peace conference going on between two prominent nations which is always an indication to the prelude to war.
 |
| War is destruction |
If this is true than there must be a reason for it, basic to the fundamental life of nations. Maybe it is a natural manifestation of civilization, or that civilization is naturally competing for power to exist over other nations.
Devil in the mix
 |
| War is production |
This agitation then would be present to indicate some sort of evolving contentions continually promoting war. So far then, all I hinted so far was war was bad for a good reason to the continued development of nations, i.e., humanity. Sounds like a fallacy to me, a fallacy nevertheless purposeful, for what, seems obscure. So why then do we have war, war, war all the time?
No comments:
Post a Comment