Creation vs evolution

Evolution Cannot Create

Creation can Evolve 

Evolution is an action verb and creation is the subject that evolves. Evolution by itself can only evolve from something. We are therefore left with nothing from evolution, by itself alone, to evolve. 

So what evolves from that which is created? Since everything seen comes from the unseen we are forced to assume evolution comes from an unseen force so that it is a seen in action, as it evolves and continues to evolve. 

If someone cannot understand the unseen spirit from which everything seen comes, they are left with an evolution from which evolved from nothing. What was first to evolve? The chicken? Then how did the egg get here? Sounds like the big bang all over again telling me that standing water is nothing, only the steam bubbles that arise from the seen water was the first to exist.

For my part I am convinced I can to reason better than that. So this is where my thinking carried me. Evolution exists and also evolves but how did it come to exist in the first place? It exists because it was created in the first place by the unseen Spirit. 

Placed in Our Hearts from our Beginning

God is, like a massive group epiphany everyone in every state of evolvement agrees. God is a spirit, as the Holy Spirit. The Spirit personified is God who, naturally, created us like Himself. Everything God creates I am convinced, He has provided free will in order the created can evolve. By simple observation we can see animals to be animals would be continuing to evolve so they must have free will. Why? So they can evolve in order to survive and prosper. 

Problem with Grammar?

The seen is seen evolving

I myself was taught to diagram my sentences in the fourth grade. So I've always wondered what the problem was between creation the subject and the subject creation evolving. That is how verbized subjects do things. As I first read Genesis, many years ago now, I thought the Bible gave a better and more complete description of evolution than the truncated incomplete evolutionist view. Otherwise? So where is the controversy?