Roughly Speaking
How the previous entry, thinking about the quote by Camus, works into my little paradigm is like this: Remember, I still think that if a person does not think logically then they might as well be a street corner propagandist pamphleteer.
But, since proving God is not acceptable to God, then where does that put the no-God view and all my gorgeous logic? It was through logic that I figured out and proved that we could not actually prove anything for certain, except each to our own satisfaction. That was quite clear.
I believe no-matter what!
So, then I fell back on what was already there, my no-matter what position. We are all forced to believe up or down whatever we believe if we believe anything at all. This means the power is in the belief one musters. I experienced that power, and that is why I have said that a man with an experience is not at the mercy of one with a theory.
Hither to I have referred to this experience as an epiphany and this is also why epiphanies are not attractive to groups of individuals who seek utopian dreams while Christianity requires an individual decision. That is one of the ways it becomes personal. Person in turn leads us to the individual.
No comments:
Post a Comment