Differing Exactitudes Form
Foundation for Errors?
There are many today who are first, will be last tomorrow, and many today who are last, will be first soon enough. Jesus is quoted often highlighting this idea in more than one Gospel manuscript. Some translators are convinced that various understandable discrepancies existing in the gospels indicate major disagreements suggesting a serious challenge to their truth. Next in their thinking? If they instead agree this will parade evidence for collusion?
I think the lack of collusion is of far greater strength for the Gospel's truth. I understand only one manuscript of Homer's survived the Alexsandra fire. Jesus authored nothing, yet was quoted endlessly beyond counting. Still, some suggest Jesus never existed?
No comments:
Post a Comment