Lack of Secular Evidence

 Host of Spiritual Evidence

Haunts Secularists

The claim the lack of secular evidence for Jesus' existence is logic worthy by secularists tangling themselves in a myriad of self interest rationalizations'. 

Secular evidence has a long history of being politically corrupted, nothing new there. Because they do not believe in God in the first place, they claim lack of evidence in the second. It is the same as a cleric saying there is a lack of spiritual evidence for the secular. What an obviously tangled web we mortals weave. 

Ancients Smarter than today's Scholars think

Tyranny of the myth

Many scholars today tend to attribute the ancients as dealing exclusively in myths. If it is old then it is a myth. However, many myths have been discovered to be actual events. 

Some go so far as to attribute works of the ancients as aided by extra terrestrials or totally accomplished by travelers from another world, only to discover information revealing how our own ancients accomplished what amazes scholars of today. 

The Roman Colosseum was, I believe, one of those incidents. Discovered in a in Roman library in London, with drawings yet. This event is not very old either. Astro devices orbiting the earth reveal a body of water connected via canals to Rome, an inland bay not imagined until our day. These occurrences will likely continue in the future. Cities beneath the sea, the list goes on even as the tyranny of myth list shrinks. 

God is Only Pleased with Faith

Faith Rating Zero 

Skeptic Goal

If judgement required to believe the truth of an event is true, to skeptics, is only true if there is no faith needed. In another vein, if something is entirely explainable in a routine manner, then it is easy to believe and is therefore true. But if faith is required, then the situation is untrue. 

Jesus Existed and Rose Again

Therefore proof that God exists eliminates faith from the situation, the ultimate skeptics' goal in every event. Nevertheless, there is such a host of surviving documents composed by so many different authors that to claim Jesus never existed is to reveal the constant attraction the skeptics paint far too dubious to consider relevant. 

Did Jesus Really Exist?

Notes on Existence...  from the Web 

The answer to whether or not Jesus truly existed is different depending on who you ask. Many historians believe that the man responsible for the largest religion in the world was a real person, while others argue that the man was simply folklore.

Some reasons for attempting to discredit Jesus include a lack of eyewitness accounts, the vague writings of the New Testament, and the lack of secular evidence.

Outside of the Biblical world, there is little proof that Moses was a real figure. Historians have questioned his existence due to a vague timeframe and the extent of his actions. However, many scientists have corroborated the biblical figures’ actions, such as parting the Red Sea, with naturally occurring forces in nature. Others who may not have existed include Jack The Ripper and Solomon. Great duo there, all framed in advertising. 

Reaction entries continue tomorrow....

Why I attend church

I go to church...

...to strengthen my faith, conceptualize it more clearly, as well as to witness and praise God. But, mostly to increase my faith. Instead I found my faith under attack and weakened, actually losing it altogether for a time. 

As a result of formally studying Logic in college under a professor, also a minister, I in due course regained by faith beginning with the realization I had based my prior atheism on the fallacy misplaced authority. I have come to believe churchgoers generate, via their individual testimonies, many understandably atheist antichristian beliefs. 

However, this reasoning is also based on a fallacy, as mine was. In my experience an overwhelming majority of atheists' views are a result of interacting with churchgoers. One has to have a very strong Christian belief to weather the spiritual struggles I have witnessed in many churches, especially those  based on personal fantasies and sheer lack of Biblical knowledge.

definition of faith

Who Blew the Whistle

On No Faith?

All the Way

If anyone decides they did not get healed, then they gave up. If one speaks of being unhealed in the past tense then they have already locked themselves unhealed in the present tense as well, until that is, they gain greater faith. 

I do Not Question God

I figure it is not profitable for me to believe in an eternal God who is Himself bowed down subject to time, like all flesh. So I figure if He did not heal me yet then I did not have great enough faith. Not no faith, as some I've heard preach. Rather, not enough faith yet. I go to God for answers. I do not then question His answers. 

Bedrock definition of faith, to be faith at all, is permanent, ever lasting, never give up, persistence. 

Believing in.....

Resurrection Faith

Everything in Christianity if based on belief, how great it is or how little, as Jesus referred to it in several different written contexts. The core of everything is belief in Jesus resurrection from His death on the Cross for our sins, which then renders us free to excel. 

It occurred to me that believing in something believable requires very little belief. Believing something beyond extraordinary requires a great deal of belief. Christianity is based on belief of events on the Cross, which require strong belief if one thinks about it.

Mountain Moving Faith

Jesus maintained that if anyone had enough belief then belief in extraordinary events could occur, even to throwing a mountain into the sea. This is the spirit driving events in the seen manifestations of the flesh. Everything is based on belief and faith in belief. Many believe Jesus was only speaking figuratively about the mountain, So was this also true about the Cross or about Jonah?

If it was possible for Jonah then it was possible for Jesus along with all the mountains in all the mountain ranges everywhere.  Who knows? Next we'll be talking about walking on the moon. 

Everything seen came from the unseen. 

Somebody then must have believed it all at some point. Where did the idea for all this that surrounds us come from? God is a Spirit Person who believed. He then spoke His belief into the seen and it did not return to Him void. We dream at night after death of the day's events. Events that seemed so real while dreaming do not retain their greatest believability as when in the dream. 

This shows me the dream reality may be more real in the dream than the awake, seen in reality. It may be so hard to imagine out because it is tomorrow's magic today. So, for now, I will conclude that my belief is on Jesus, no matter what happens or is about to happen. It looks like the foolish things of this world will confound the wise when all the facts are known, but not yet now taken in.

Greater Works

"I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do he will do also; and greater works than these he will do, because I go to the Father. And whatever you ask in My name, that I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything in My name, I will do it." John 14:12-14 

definition of rationalization

The devil made me do it

Sometime ago I read of some Christians who blamed the inquisition on St Paul for saying that he condemned an "unbudged" soul to burn in hell since he did not respond to Paul's attempts to convert him. I estimate now as I recall, my impression was it was a group of a hundred or so.

Seems to me those who carried out the acts of the inquisition should be those to be blamed. This is an example if the ability to blame anyone in sight for their own the devil made me do it guilt. I suspect there were "underlying" motives satisfied here.

Either some thing or no thing

 Process of elimination

Any view that does not believe in God is by definition forcing adherents to believe in themselves instead. This is the only free will power choice they have, which is to say this view believes in nothing out of something. Meanwhile something, all that God has already spoken into Existence continues, and remains on display.

Pulpit talk pompous gibberish

No offense!

One preacher I heard declare only those with a soul will be in heaven, as I have already recently said. So that left out the little boy who asked if his dog will be with him in heaven. No dog? Not much of a heaven for that little boy, not only for him, but for the rest of us as well. 

Having a soul will not get anyone in heaven. Only grace gets one in heaven, if they accept it. If the little boy wants his dog in heaven then if he himself is in heaven, then his dog will be in heaven. 

What kind of a heaven would it be for that for the little boy, without his dog? Is he to watch the lion lay down with the ram without his dog alongside? This is an example of doctrinaire-like nonsense coming from many solitary confinement pulpits in just my narrow lifetime. 

No wonder believers are shrinking, with so many churches churning out baby atheists as young as fourteen without any awareness of the basics of Christianity. This might be the prime reason why. 

The teachers were the pupils, now they are teaching, teaching the younger pupils how to make earrings out of buttons. I have my perfect attendance pins to boast it. 😒

Creation vs evolution

Evolution Cannot Create

Creation can Evolve 

Evolution is an action verb and creation is the subject that evolves. Evolution by itself can only evolve from something. We are therefore left with nothing from evolution, by itself alone, to evolve. 

So what evolves from that which is created? Since everything seen comes from the unseen we are forced to assume evolution comes from an unseen force so that it is a seen in action, as it evolves and continues to evolve. 

If someone cannot understand the unseen spirit from which everything seen comes, they are left with an evolution from which evolved from nothing. What was first to evolve? The chicken? Then how did the egg get here? Sounds like the big bang all over again telling me that standing water is nothing, only the steam bubbles that arise from the seen water was the first to exist.

For my part I am convinced I can to reason better than that. So this is where my thinking carried me. Evolution exists and also evolves but how did it come to exist in the first place? It exists because it was created in the first place by the unseen Spirit. 

Placed in Our Hearts from our Beginning

God is, like a massive group epiphany everyone in every state of evolvement agrees. God is a spirit, as the Holy Spirit. The Spirit personified is God who, naturally, created us like Himself. Everything God creates I am convinced, He has provided free will in order the created can evolve. By simple observation we can see animals to be animals would be continuing to evolve so they must have free will. Why? So they can evolve in order to survive and prosper. 

Problem with Grammar?

The seen is seen evolving

I myself was taught to diagram my sentences in the fourth grade. So I've always wondered what the problem was between creation the subject and the subject creation evolving. That is how verbized subjects do things. As I first read Genesis, many years ago now, I thought the Bible gave a better and more complete description of evolution than the truncated incomplete evolutionist view. Otherwise? So where is the controversy?